Vegetarianism
From Wikipedia Mirror
Template:About Vegetarianism is the practice of following a diet based on plant-based foods including fruits, vegetables, cereal grains, nuts, and seeds, with or without dairy products and eggs.[1] Vegetarians do not eat meat, game, poultry, fish, crustacea, shellfish, or products of animal slaughter such as animal-derived gelatin and rennet.[1][1][1] A vegan diet is a form of vegetarian diet which excludes all animal products, including dairy products, eggs, and honey. A lacto-vegetarian diet includes dairy products but excludes eggs, an ovo-vegetarian diet includes eggs but not dairy, and a lacto-ovo vegetarian diet includes both eggs and dairy products.
A semi-vegetarian diet consists largely of vegetarian foods, but may include fish and sometimes poultry, as well as dairy products and eggs. A pescetarian diet, for example, includes fish but no meat.[1] The association of semi-vegetarianism with vegetarianism in common use[1] has led vegetarian groups such as the Vegetarian Society to note these diets are not vegetarian.[1]
Vegetarianism may be adopted for ethical, health, environmental, religious, political, cultural, aesthetic, economic, or other reasons.
Terminology and varieties of vegetarianism
| Diet name | Meat, poultry, fish | Eggs | Dairy | Honey |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lacto-ovo vegetarianism | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Lacto vegetarianism | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Ovo vegetarianism | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Veganism | No | No | No | No[1][1][1] |
Other dietary practices commonly associated with vegetarianism
- Fruitarianism is a diet of only fruit, nuts, seeds, and other plant matter that can be gathered without harming the plant.
- Su vegetarianism (such as in Buddhism), excludes all animal products as well as the fetid vegetables: onion, garlic, scallions, leeks, or shallots.
- Macrobiotic diet is a diet of mostly whole grains and beans. Not all macrobiotics are vegetarians, as some consume fish.
- Raw veganism is a diet of fresh and uncooked fruit, nuts, seeds, and vegetables.
- Dietary veganism: whereas vegans do not use animal products of any kind, dietary vegans restrict their veganism to their diet.[1]
Strict vegetarians also avoid products that may use animal ingredients not included in their labels or which use animal products in their manufacturing e.g. cheeses that use animal rennet, gelatin (from animal skin, bones, and connective tissue), some sugars that are whitened with bone char (e.g. cane sugar, but not beet sugar) and alcohol clarified with gelatin or crushed shellfish and sturgeon. Vegetarians who eat eggs sometimes prefer free-range eggs (as opposed to battery farmed eggs).
Semi-vegetarian diets
Semi-vegetarian diets primarily consist of vegetarian foods, but make exceptions for some non-vegetarian foods. These diets may be followed by those who choose to reduce the amount of animal flesh consumed, or sometimes as a way of transitioning to a vegetarian diet, and even for environmental reasons such as reducing methane levels (fish and poultry produce less methane than cows and other livestock). These terms are neologisms based on the word "vegetarian". They may be regarded with contention by some strict vegetarians,[1] as they combine terms for vegetarian and non-vegetarian diets.
Additionally, many individuals describe themselves as simply "vegetarian" while actually practicing a semi-vegetarian diet.[1]
- Semi-vegetarianism: A diet that excludes certain meats, particularly red meat, but includes others.
- Flexitarianism: A diet that consists primarily of vegetarian food, but includes occasional exceptions.
- Pescetarianism: A diet that is mainly vegetarian but also includes fish.
Etymology
The Vegetarian Society, founded in 1847, claims to have "created the word vegetarian from the Latin 'vegetus' meaning 'lively' (which is how these early vegetarians claimed their diet made them feel) ..."[1] However, the Oxford English Dictionary and other standard dictionaries state that the word was formed from the term "vegetable" and the suffix "-arian".[1]
The Oxford English Dictionary also gives evidence that the word was already in use before the foundation of the Vegetarian Society:
- 1839 - "If I had had to be my own cook, I should inevitably become a vegetarian." (F. A. Kemble, Jrnl. Residence on Georgian Plantation (1863) 251)
- 1842 - "To tell a healthy vegetarian that his diet is very uncongenial with the wants of his nature." (Healthian, Apr. 34)
but notes that "The general use of the word appears to have been largely due to the formation of the Vegetarian Society at Ramsgate in 1847."
History
Template:Main The earliest records of (lacto) [1] vegetarianism as a concept and practice amongst a significant number of people come from ancient India.[1] Vegetarianism was also practiced by the ancient Greek civilisation in Southern Italy and in Greece in the 6th century BCE.[1] In both instances the diet was closely connected with the idea of nonviolence towards animals (called ahimsa in India) and was promoted by religious groups and philosophers.[1] Following the Christianisation of the Roman Empire in late antiquity, vegetarianism practically disappeared from Europe.[1] Several orders of monks in medieval Europe restricted or banned the consumption of meat for ascetic reasons, but none of them eschewed fish.[1] Vegetarianism re-emerged somewhat in Europe during the Renaissance.[1] It became a more widespread practice in the 19th and 20th centuries.
In 1847 the first Vegetarian Society was founded in England;[1] Germany, the Netherlands and other countries followed. The International Vegetarian Union, a union of the national societies, was founded in 1908. In the Western world, the popularity of vegetarianism grew during the 20th century as a result of nutritional, ethical, and more recently, environmental and economic concerns. Today, Indian vegetarians, primarily lacto vegetarians, are estimated to make up more than 70% of the world's vegetarians. They make up 20–42% of the population in India, while less than 30% are regular meat-eaters.[1][1][1] The statewise data is as follows:[1]
- 69% of Gujarat
- 60% of Rajasthan
- 54% of Punjab-Haryana
- 50% of Uttar Pradesh
- 45% of Madhya Pradesh
- 34% of Karnataka
- 30% of Maharashtra
- 21% of Tamil Nadu
- 16% of Andhra Pradesh
- 15% of Assam
- 6% in Kerala, Orissa and West Bengal
Although direct statistics are not available for Bihar, the pattern is similar to Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Punjab-Haryana. The pattern in Jammu and Kashmir is similar to those of Kerala,West Bengal and Orissa.
Surveys in the U.S. have found that roughly 1–2.8% of adults eat no meat (including poultry or fish).[1][1][1][1]
Surveys in the UK have found that roughly 11% of the population are vegetarian.[1]
Health benefits and concerns
Vegetarianism is considered a healthy, viable diet. The American Dietetic Association and the Dietitians of Canada have found a properly planned vegetarian diet to satisfy the nutritional needs for all stages of life, and large-scale studies have shown vegetarianism to significantly lower risks of cancer, ischaemic heart disease, and other fatal diseases.[1][1][1] Necessary nutrients, proteins, and amino acids for the body's sustenance can be found in vegetables, grains, nuts, soymilk, eggs and dairy.[1]
Vegetarian diets can aid in keeping body weight under control[1][1] and substantially reduce risks of heart disease and osteoporosis.[1][1][1][1] Non-lean red meat, in particular, has been found to be directly associated with dramatically increased risk of cancers of the lung, oesophagus, liver, and colon.[1][1] Other studies have shown that there were no significant differences between vegetarians and nonvegetarians in mortality from cerebrovascular disease, stomach cancer, colorectal cancer,breast cancer, or prostate cancer, although the sample of vegetarians was small and included ex-smokers who had switched their diet within the last five years.[1]
The American Dietetic Association and Dietitians of Canada have stated: "Vegetarian diets offer a number of nutritional benefits, including lower levels of saturated fat, cholesterol, and animal protein as well as higher levels of carbohydrates, fibre, magnesium, potassium, folate, and antioxidants such as vitamins C and E and phytochemicals."[1] Vegetarians tend to have lower body mass index, lower levels of cholesterol, lower blood pressure, and less incidence of heart disease, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, renal disease, osteoporosis, dementias such as Alzheimer’s Disease and other disorders.[1]
Nutrition
Western vegetarian diets are typically high in carotenoids, but relatively low in long-chain n-3 fatty acids and vitamin B12. Vegans can have particularly low intake of vitamin B and calcium if they do not eat enough items such as collard greens, leafy greens, tempeh and tofu (soy). High levels of dietary fibre, folic acid, vitamins C and E, and magnesium, and low consumption of saturated fat are all considered to be beneficial aspects of a vegetarian diet.[1][1]
Protein
Protein intake in vegetarian diets is only slightly lower than in meat diets and can meet daily requirements for any person, including athletes and bodybuilders.[1] Studies atTemplate:Who Harvard University as well as other studies conducted in the United States, Great Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and various European countries, have confirmed that vegetarian diets provide sufficient protein intake as long as a variety of plant sources are available and consumed.[1] Proteins are composed of amino acids, and a common concern with protein acquired from vegetable sources is an adequate intake of the essential amino acids, which cannot be synthesised by the human body. While dairy and egg products provide complete sources for lacto-ovo vegetarians, the only vegetable sources with significant amounts of all eight types of essential amino acids are lupin, soy, hempseed, chia seed, amaranth, buckwheat, and quinoa. It is not necessary, however, to obtain protein from these sources—the essential amino acids can also be obtained by eating a variety of complementary plant sources that, in combination, provide all eight essential amino acids (e.g. brown rice and beans, or hummus and whole wheat pita, though protein combining in the same meal is not necessary). A varied intake of such sources can be adequate, a 1994 study found.[1] Some years later, it became clear that even "combining proteins" is not necessary. As reported by Dr. Weil in 2000 in his print newsletter, and as reiterated in a 2002 post on his website, and again in the 2005 update:
You may have heard that vegetable sources of protein are 'incomplete' and become 'complete' only when correctly combined. Research has discredited that notion so you don't have to worry that you won't get enough usable protein if you don't put together some magical combination of foods at each meal.[1]
Iron
Vegetarian diets typically contain similar levels of iron to non-vegetarian diets, but this has lower bioavailability than iron from meat sources, and its absorption can sometimes be inhibited by other dietary constituents. Vegetarian foods rich in iron include black beans, cashews, hempseed, kidney beans, lentils, oatmeal, raisins, black-eyed peas, soybeans, many breakfast cereals, sunflower seeds, chickpeas, tomato juice, tempeh, molasses, thyme, and whole-wheat bread.[1] The related vegan diets can often be higher in iron than vegetarian diets, because dairy products are low in iron.[1] Iron stores often tend to be lower in vegetarians than non-vegetarians and iron deficiency is thus more common in vegetarian and vegan women and children (adult males are rarely iron deficient), however, iron deficiency anaemia is rare no matter the diet.[1][1]
Vitamin B12
Plants are not generally significant sources of Vitamin B12.[1] However, lacto-ovo vegetarians can obtain B12 from dairy products and eggs, and vegans can obtain it from fortified foods and dietary supplements.[1][1] Since the human body preserves B12 and reuses it without destroying the substance, clinical evidence of B12 deficiency is uncommon.[1][1] The body can preserve stores of the vitamin for up to 30 years without needing its supplies to be replenished.[1]
The only reliable vegan sources of B12 are foods fortified with B12 (including some soy products and some breakfast cereals) and B12 supplements.[1][1] The research on vitamin B12 sources has increased in the latest years.[1]
Fatty acids
Fish is a non-vegetarian source of Omega 3 fatty acids. Plant-based, or vegetarian, sources exist such as soy, walnuts, pumpkin seeds, canola oil and especially hempseed, chia seed, flaxseed, and purslane. Purslane contains more Omega 3 than any other known leafy green. Plant foods can provide alpha-linolenic acid but not the long-chain n-3 fatty acids EPA and DHA, which are found in low levels in eggs and dairy products. Vegetarians, and particularly vegans, have lower levels of EPA and DHA than meat-eaters. While the health effects of low levels of EPA and DHA are unknown, it is unlikely that supplementation with alpha-linolenic acid will significantly increase levels.[1] Recently, some companies have begun to market vegetarian DHA supplements containing seaweed extracts. Similar supplements providing both DHA and EPA have also begun to appear.[1] Whole seaweeds are not suitable for supplementation because their high iodine content limits the amount that may be safely consumed. However, certain algae such as spirulina are good sources of gamma-linolenic acid (GLA), alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), linoleic acid (LA), stearidonic acid (SDA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and arachidonic acid (AA).[1][1]
Calcium
Calcium intake in vegetarians is similar to non-vegetarians. Some impaired bone mineralisation has been found among vegans who do not consume enough leafy greens, which are sources of abundant calcium.[1] Some sources of calcium include broccoli, cauliflower, beet greens, bok choy, collard greens, kale, and soy beans.[1] However, this is not found in lacto-ovo vegetarians.[1]
Vitamin D
Vitamin D levels do not appear to be lower in vegetarians (although studies have shown that much of the general population is deficient[1][1]). Vitamin D needs can be met via the human body's own generation upon sufficient and sensible UV sun exposure.[1] Products including milk, soy milk and cereal grains may be fortified to provide a good source of Vitamin D[1] and mushrooms provide over 2700 IU per serving (approx. 3 oz or 1/2 cup) of vitamin D2, if exposed to just 5 minutes of UV light after being harvested;[1] for those who do not get adequate sun exposure and/or food sources, Vitamin D supplementation may be necessary.
Longevity
A 1999 metastudy[1] compared five major studies from western countries. The study found that the mortality ratio was the lowest in fish eaters (0.82) followed by vegetarians (0.84) and occasional meat eaters (0.84), and was then followed by regular meat eaters (1.0) and vegans (1.0).[1] When the study made its best estimate of mortality ratio with confounding factors considered, the mortality ratio for vegetarians was found to be (0.94).[1]
In "Mortality in British vegetarians",[1] it was concluded that "British vegetarians have low mortality compared with the general population. Their death rates are similar to those of comparable non-vegetarians, suggesting that much of this benefit may be attributed to non-dietary lifestyle factors such as a low prevalence of smoking and a generally high socio-economic status, or to aspects of the diet other than the avoidance of meat and fish."
The Adventist Health Study is an ongoing study of life expectancy in Seventh-day Adventists. This is the only study among others with similar methodology which had favourable indication for vegetarianism. The researchers found that a combination of different lifestyle choices could influence life expectancy by as much as 10 years. Among the lifestyle choices investigated, a vegetarian diet was estimated to confer an extra 1–1/2 to 2 years of life. The researchers concluded that "the life expectancies of California Adventist men and women are higher than those of any other well-described natural population" at 78.5 years for men and 82.3 years for women. The life expectancy of California Adventists surviving to age 30 was 83.3 years for men and 85.7 years for women.[1]
The Adventist health study is again incorporated into a metastudy titled "Does low meat consumption increase life expectancy in humans?" published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, which concluded that low meat eating (less than once per week) and other lifestyle choices significantly increase life expectancy, relative to a group with high meat intake.[1] The study concluded that "The findings from one cohort of healthy adults raises the possibility that long-term (≥ 2 decades) adherence to a vegetarian diet can further produce a significant 3.6-y increase in life expectancy." However, the study also concluded that "Some of the variation in the survival advantage in vegetarians may have been due to marked differences between studies in adjustment for confounders, the definition of vegetarian, measurement error, age distribution, the healthy volunteer effect, and intake of specific plant foods by the vegetarians." It further states that "This raises the possibility that a low-meat, high plant-food dietary pattern may be the true causal protective factor rather than simply elimination of meat from the diet." In a recent review of studies relating low-meat diet patterns to all-cause mortality, Singh noted that "5 out of 5 studies indicated that adults who followed a low meat, high plant-food diet pattern experienced significant or marginally significant decreases in mortality risk relative to other patterns of intake."
Statistical studies, such as comparing life expectancy with regional areas and local diets in Europe also have found life expectancy considerably greater in southern France, where a low meat, high plant Mediterranean diet is common, than northern France, where a diet with high meat content is more common.[1]
A study by the Institute of Preventive and Clinical Medicine, and Institute of Physiological Chemistry looked at a group of 19 vegetarians (lacto-ovo) and used as a comparison a group of 19 omnivorous subjects recruited from the same region. The study found that this group of vegetarians (lacto-ovo) have a significantly higher amount of plasma carboxymethyllysine and advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) compared to this group of omnivores.[1] Carboxymethyllysine is a glycation product which represents "a general marker of oxidative stress and long-term damage of proteins in aging, atherosclerosis and diabetes." "Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) may play an important adverse role in process of atherosclerosis, diabetes, aging and chronic renal failure."
Food safety
Libby Sande argued in a blog for USA Today that Vegetarianism reduces E. coli infections,[1] and in a piece for The New York Times linked E. coli contamination in food to industrial scale meat and dairy farms.[1] E. coli infections in the US during 2006 were traced to spinach and onions.[1]Template:Dead link[1]
Transmission of pathogenic E. coli often occurs via fecal-oral transmission.[1][1][1] Common routes of transmission include unhygienic food preparation[1] and farm contamination.[1][1][1] Dairy and beef cattle are primary reservoirs of the E. coli strain O157:H7,[1] and they can carry it asymptomatically and shed it in their feces.[1] Food products associated with E. coli outbreaks include raw ground beef,[1] raw seed sprouts or spinach,[1] raw milk, unpasteurized juice, and foods contaminated by infected food workers via fecal-oral route.[1] In 2005, some people who had consumed triple-washed, pre-packaged lettuce were infected with E. coli.[1] In 2007, packaged lettuce salads were recalled after they were found to be contaminated with E. coli.[1] E. coli outbreaks have been traced to unpasteurised apples,[1] orange juice, milk, alfalfa sprouts,[1] and water.[1]
Salmonella outbreaks have been traced to peanut butter, frozen pot pies & puffed vegetable snacks.[1] BSE, also known as mad cow disease, is linked by the World Health Organization to Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease in humans.[1]
There have been reports of fears of foot-and-mouth disease in sheep, PCBs in farmed salmon, mercury in fish, dioxin concentrations in animal products, artificial growth hormones, antibiotics, lead and mercury,[1] pesticide contamination of vegetables and fruits, banned chemicals being used to ripen fruits.[1][1][1] In 2005, fears that "bird flu" could be caused by eating chicken were featured in a PETA call for vegetarian diets.[1]
Medical use
In Western medicine, patients are sometimes advised to adhere to a vegetarian diet.[1] Certain alternative medicines, such as Ayurveda and Siddha, prescribe a vegetarian diet as a normal procedure.[1]
Physiology
The mainstream scientific consensus is that humans are physiologically best suited to an omnivore diet. The Vegetarian Resource Group, among others, has concluded that humans are naturally omnivores based on the human ability to digest meat, as well as plant foods,[1][1] with the correspondent metabolic tendency to an adaptation that makes them need both animal and vegetable nourishment. Other arguments hold that humans are more anatomically similar to herbivores, with long intestinal tracts and blunt teeth, unlike omnivores and carnivores.Template:Citation needed Nutritional experts believe that early hominids evolved into eating meat as a result of huge climatic changes that took place three to four million years ago, when forests and jungles dried up and became open grasslands and opened hunting and scavenging opportunities.[1][1]
Animal-to-human disease transmissions
The consumption of meat can cause a transmission of a number of diseases from animals to humans.[1] The connection between infected animal and human illness is well established in the case of salmonella; an estimated one-third to one-half of all chicken meat marketed in the United States is contaminated with salmonella.[1] Only recently, however, have scientists begun to suspect that there is a similar connection between animal meat and human cancer, birth defects, mutations, and many other diseases in humans.[1][1][1][1][1][1][1] In 1975, one study found 75 percent of supermarket samples of cow's milk, and 75 percent of egg samples to contain the leukemia (cancer) virus.[1] By 1985, nearly 100 percent of the eggs tested, or the hens they came from, had the cancer virus.[1][1] The rate of disease among chickens is so high that the Department of Labor has ranked the poultry industry as one of the most hazardous occupations - not for the chickens but for those who raise, slaughter and process them.[1] 20 percent of all cows are afflicted with a variety of cancer known as bovine leukemia virus (BLV).[1] Studies have increasingly linked BLV with HTLV-1, the first human retrovirus discovered to cause cancer.[1] Scientists have successfully infected human cells with a bovine immunodeficiency virus (BIV), the equivalent of the AIDS virus in cows.[1] It is supposed that BIV may have a role in the development of a number of malignant or slow viruses in humans.[1]Template:Clarify
The proximity of animals in industrial-scale animal farming leads to an increased rate of disease transmission. Transition of animal influenza viruses to humans has been documented, but illness from such cases is rare compared to that caused by the now common human-adapted older influenza viruses,[1] transferred from animals to humans in the more distant past.[1][1][1][1] The first documented case was in 1959, and in 1998, 18 new human cases of H5N1 influenza were diagnosed, in which six people died. In 1997 more cases of H5N1 avian influenza were found in chickens in Hong Kong.[1]
Whether tuberculosis originated in cattle and was then transferred to humans, or diverged from a common ancestor infecting a different species, is currently unclear.[1] The strongest evidence for a domestic-animal origin exists for measles and pertussis, although the data do not exclude a non-domestic origin.[1]
According to the 'Hunter Theory', the "simplest and most plausible explanation for the cross-species transmission" the AIDS virus was transmitted from a chimpanzee to a human when a bushmeat hunter was bitten or cut while hunting or butchering an animal.[1]
Historian Norman Cantor, in In the Wake of the Plague: The Black Death and the World It made (2001), suggests the Black Death might have been a combination of pandemics including a form of anthrax, a cattle murrain. He cites many forms of evidence including the fact that meat from infected cattle was known to have been sold in many rural English areas prior to the onset of the plague.
Eating disorders
The American Dietetic Association indicates that vegetarian diets may be more common among adolescents with eating disorders but that the evidence suggests that the adoption of a vegetarian diet does not lead to eating disorders, rather that "vegetarian diets may be selected to camouflage an existing eating disorder."[1] Other studies and statements by dietitians and counselors support this conclusion.[1][1][1]
Additional reasons for a vegetarian diet
Childhood IQ and diet choice
A study published in the British Medical Journal in 2007 compared children's IQ at age 10 with their having a vegetarian diet at age 30. The report did not provide information on whether or not the children were already vegetarian at the time when their IQ measurement was taken. It also noted that there was no difference in IQ among those vegetarians who ate only plants, and those who also ate chicken and fish.[1] The BBC summarized part of the results of the study, stating "Men who were vegetarian had an IQ score of 106, compared with 101 for non-vegetarians; while female vegetarians averaged 104, compared with 99 for non-vegetarians."[1] The report concluded that “Higher scores for IQ in childhood are associated with an increased likelihood of being a vegetarian as an adult.”[1] Lead researcher Catharine Gale noted that this link may not be causal, but “may be merely an example of many other lifestyle preferences that might be expected to vary with intelligence.”[1]
Ethics
Various ethical reasons have been suggested for choosing vegetarianism.
Religion
Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism teach vegetarianism as moral conduct. Buddhism in general does not prohibit meat eating, while Mahayana Buddhism encourages vegetarianism as beneficial for developing compassion. Other denominations that advocate a fully vegetarian diet include the Seventh-day Adventists, the Rastafari movement and the Hare Krishnas. Sikhism[1][1][1] does not equate spirituality with diet and does not specify a vegetarian or meat diet.[1]
Hinduism
Template:Main Most major paths of Hinduism hold vegetarianism as an ideal. There are three main reasons for this: the principle of nonviolence (ahimsa) applied to animals;[1] the intention to offer only "pure" (vegetarian) food to a deity and then to receive it back as prasad;[1] and the conviction that non-vegetarian food is detrimental for the mind and for spiritual development.
However, the food habits of Hindus vary according to their community and according to regional traditions. Hindu vegetarians usually eschew eggs but consume milk and dairy products, so they are lacto-vegetarians.
Jainism
Template:Main Followers of Jainism are most commonly lacto-vegetarians. No products obtained from dead animals are allowed. Jains hold vegetarianism as the ideal diet in a similar fashion to Hindu traditions but with emphasis on their principle of non-violence (ahimsa). This is for them an indispensable condition for spiritual progress.[1][1] Some particularly dedicated individuals are fruitarians.[1] Honey is forbidden, because its collection is seen as violence against the bees. Some Jains do not consume plant parts that grow underground such as roots and bulbs, because tiny animals may be killed when the plants are pulled up.[1]
Buddhism
Template:Main Theravadins consider that taking of life and eating meat which is killed on their behalf to be the same. If Buddhist monks "see, hear or know" a living animal was killed specifically for them to eat, they must refuse it or else incur an offense. Buddha did not make any comment discouraging them to eat meat (except specific types, such as human, elephant, horse, dog, snake, lion, tiger, leopard, bear, and hyena flesh[1]) nor did he make any rule or prohibition in his religion on any thing.
In Mahayana Buddhism, there are several Sanskrit texts where the Buddha instructs his followers to avoid meat.
Sikhism
Template:Main Followers of Sikhism do not have a preference for meat or vegetarian consumption.[1][1][1][1] There are two views on initiated or "Amritdhari Sikhs" and meat consumption. "Amritdhari" Sikhs (i.e. those that follow the Sikh Rehat Maryada (the Official Sikh Code of Conduct[1]) can eat meat (provided it is not Kutha meat)."Amritdharis" that belong to some Sikh sects (eg Akhand Kirtani Jatha, Damdami Taksal, Namdhari,[1] Rarionwalay,[1] etc.) are vehemently against the consumption of meat and eggs.[1]
In the case of meat, the Sikh Gurus have indicated their preference for a simple diet,[1] which could include meat or be vegetarian. Passages from the Guru Granth Sahib (the holy book of Sikhs, also known as the Adi Granth) say that fools argue over this issue. Guru Nanak said that over consumption of food (Lobh, Greed) involves a drain on the Earth's resources and thus on life.[1] The tenth guru, Guru Gobind Singh, prohibited the Sikhs from the consumption of halal or kosher (Kutha, any ritually slaughtered meat) meat because of the Sikh belief that sacrificing an animal in the name of God is mere ritualism (something to be avoided).[1]
Judaism
A number of medieval scholars of Jewish religion (e.g. Joseph Albo) regard vegetarianism as a moral ideal, not just because of a concern for the welfare of animals, but because the slaughter of animals might cause the individual who performs such acts to develop negative character traits. Therefore, their concern was with regard to possible harmful effects upon human character rather than with animal welfare. Indeed, Rabbi Joseph Albo maintains that renunciation of the consumption of meat for reasons of concern for animal welfare is not only morally erroneous but even repugnant.[1]
One modern-day scholar who is often cited as in favour of vegetarianism is the late Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook, the Chief Rabbi of Pre-State Israel. It is indeed the case that in his writings, Rabbi Kook speaks of vegetarianism as an ideal, and points to the fact that Adam did not partake of the flesh of animals. In context, however, Rabbi Kook makes those comments in his portrayal of the eschatological (messianic) era.
According to some Kabbalists, only a mystic, who is able to sense and elevate the reincarnated human souls and "divine sparks", is permitted to consume meat, though eating the flesh of an animal might still cause spiritual damage to the soul. A number of Orthodox Jewish vegetarian groups and activists promote such ideas and believe that the halakhic permission to eat meat is a temporary leniency for those who are not ready yet to accept the vegetarian diet.[1]
Having ties with both ancient Judaism and Christianity, members of the ancient Essene religious group practiced strict vegetarianism sharing a similar belief with the Hindus'/Jains' idea of Ahimsa or "harmlessness".[1]
Translation of the Torah's Ten Commandments state "thou shalt not murder."[1][1] Many argue that this can also be taken as meaning not to kill at all, animals nor humans, or at least "that one shall not kill unnecessarily," in the same manner that onerous restrictions on slavery in the Bible have been interpreted by modern theologians as to suggest banning the practice.[1]
While it is neither required nor prohibited for Jews to eat meat, the choice must be made in regard to the ethics and ideals of JudaismTemplate:Cite web
Classical Greek Philosophy and Religion
Ancient/Classical Greek Philosophy has a long tradition of vegetarianism. Orpheus was a vegetarian, and his followers were expected to be. Pythagoras was reportedly Orphic (and studied at Mt. Carmel, where some historians say there was a vegetarian community) a vegan, and his followers were expected to be. Socrates was reportedly Pythagorean, and in his dialogue of what people in a Republic, or at least Philosopher-rulers, should eat, recorded by Plato, he only described vegetarian food (he specifically said that if meat-eating was allowed, then society would require more doctors.)
Christianity
Template:Main Several Apostles that lived by most of the Nazarite oath (as Jesus did somewhat) were vegetarian.Template:Citation needed While vegetarianism is not a common practice (except by traditional monastics, and by other Orthodox at least during 'fast' times Template:Citation needed) in current Christian culture, the concept and practice have scriptural and historical support. According to the Bible, in the beginning, humans and animals were vegetarian.(Genesis 1:29–30) Immediately after the Flood, God permitted the eating of meat, (Genesis 9:3) however, some maintain that God permitted the consumption of meat temporarily because all plants had been destroyed as a result of the flood.[1]
There is also a strong association between the Quaker tradition within Christianity and vegetarianism dating back at least to the 18th century. The association grew in prominence during the 19th century, coupled with growing Quaker concerns in connection with alcohol consumption, vivisection and social purity. The association between the Quaker tradition and vegetarianism, however, becomes most significant with the founding of the Friends' Vegetarian Society in 1902 "to spread a kindlier way of living amongst the Society of Friends."[1]
Islam
Islam allows the consumption of meat, if the meat is "halal". The choice to live vegetarian is a personal decision only, supported by a general religious philosophy stressing kind treatment of animals. Vegetarianism has been practiced by some influential Muslims including the Iraqi theologian, female mystic and poet Râbi‘ah al-‘Adawîyah of Basrah, who died in the year 801, and the Sri Lankan sufi master Bawa Muhaiyaddeen who established The Bawa Muhaiyaddeen Fellowship of North America in Philadelphia.[1]
Muslims have the freedom of choice to be vegetarian for medical reasons or if they do not personally like the taste of meat. However, the choice to become vegetarian can be controversial. Although the number of Muslim vegetarians today is increasing, individual adherents tend to keep quiet about it.[1]
In January 1996, The International Vegetarian Union announced the formation of the Muslim Vegetarian/Vegan Society.[1] Many Muslims who normally eat meat will select vegetarian options when dining in non-halal restaurants.
Rastafari
Within the Afro-Caribbean community, a minority are Rastafarian and follow the dietary regulations with varying degrees of strictness. The most orthodox eat only Ital or natural foods, in which the matching of herbs or spices with vegetables is the result of long and skillfully laid down tradition originating from the African ancestry and cultural heritage of Rastafari.[1] Most Rastafarians are vegetarian. Utensils made from natural material such as stone or earthenware are preferred.
Environmental
Environmental vegetarianism is based on the belief that the production of meat and animal products for mass consumption, especially through factory farming, is environmentally unsustainable. According to a 2006 United Nations initiative, the livestock industry is one of the largest contributors to environmental degradation worldwide, and modern practices of raising animals for food contributes on a "massive scale" to air and water pollution, land degradation, climate change, and loss of biodiversity. The initiative concluded that "the livestock sector emerges as one of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to global."[1]
In July 2009 Nike and Timberland stopped buying leather from deforested Amazon [1] a few weeks after Greenpeace report demonstrated the destruction caused by Amazon cattle ranchers. According to Arnold Newman every hamburger sold results in destruction of 6.25m2 of rain forest.[1]
In addition, animal agriculture is a large source of greenhouse gases and is responsible for 18 percent of the world's greenhouse gas emissions as measured in CO2 equivalents. By comparison, all of the world's transportation (including all cars, trucks, buses, trains, ships, and planes) emits 13.5 percent of the CO2. Animal farming produces 65 percent of human-related nitrous oxide and 37 percent of all human-induced methane. Methane has about 21 times more Global Warming Potential (GWP) than carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide has 296 times the GWP of CO2.[1]
The habitat for wildlife provided by large industrial monoculture farms is very poor, and modern industrial agriculture has been considered a threat to biodiversity[1] compared with farming practices such as organic farming, permaculture, pastoral, and rainfed agriculture.
On 23 January 2008 Mr. José Manuel Barroso, President of the European Commission, presented a comprehensive package of strategies in the fight against climate change, which does not mention meat industry. In open letter to EU Parliament EVANA stated: EC scheme 20/20 by 2020 named "Europe's Climate Change Opportunity" suggests paying €3 a week. "However, it is very regrettable indeed that the individual will be obliged to finance a safer environment whilst the meat industry, one of the greatest culprits for the degradation, is allowed to enjoy ‘business as usual’ and continued payments of lavish subsidies!" [1]
Animals fed on grain, and those that rely on grazing, need far more water than grain crops.[1] According to the USDA, growing the crops necessary to feed farmed animals requires nearly half of the United States' water supply and 80 percent of its agricultural land. Additionally, animals raised for food in the U.S. consume 90 percent of the soy crop, 80 percent of the corn crop, and a total of 70 percent of its grain.[1]
When tracking food animal production from the feed trough to consumption, the inefficiencies of meat, milk and egg production range from 4:1 up to 54:1 energy input to protein output ratio. This firstly because the feed first needs to be grown before it is eaten by the cattle, and secondly because warm-blooded vertebrates need to use a lot of calories just to stay warm (unlike plants or insects).[1] An index which can be used as a measure is the efficiency of conversion of ingested food to body substance, which indicates, for example, that only 10% is converted to body substance by beef cattle, versus 19–31% by silkworms and 44% by German cockroaches.[1] Ecology professor David Pimentel has claimed, "If all the grain currently fed to livestock in the United States were consumed directly by people, the number of people who could be fed would be nearly 800 million."[1] To produce animal based food seems to be, according to these studies, typically much less efficient than the harvesting of grains, vegetables, legumes, seeds and fruits. However, this would not apply to animals that are grazed rather than fed, especially those grazed on land that could not be used for other purposes. Nor would it apply to cultivation of insects for food, which may be more environmentally sustainable than eating food coming from cattle farming.[1] Meat produced in a laboratory (called in vitro meat) may be also more environmentally sustainable than regularly produced meat.[1]
According to the theory of trophic dynamics, it requires 10 times as many crops to feed animals being bred for meat production as it would to feed the same number of people on a vegetarian diet. Currently, 70 percent of all the wheat, corn, and other grain produced is fed to farmed animals.[1] This has led many proponents of vegetarianism to believe that it is ecologically irresponsible to consume meat.[1] Rearing a relatively small number grazing animals is often beneficial, as observed by the Food Climate Research Network at Surrey University, which reports, "A little bit of livestock production is probably a good thing for the environment".[1] Template:Cquote2
In May 2009, Ghent was reported to be "the first [city] in the world to go vegetarian at least once a week" for environmental reasons, when local authorities decided to implement a "weekly meatless day". Civil servants would eat vegetarian meals one day per week, in recognition of the United Nations' report. Posters were put up by local authorities to encourage the population to take part on vegetarian days, and "veggie street maps" were printed to highlight vegetarian restaurants. In September 2009, schools in Ghent are due to have a weekly veggiedag ("vegetarian day") too.[1]
Labour conditions
Some groups, such as PETA, promote vegetarianism as a way to offset poor treatment and working conditions of workers in the contemporary meat industry.[1] These groups cite studies showing the psychological damage caused by working in the meat industry, especially in factory and industrialised settings, and argue that the meat industry violates its labourers' human rights by assigning difficult and distressing tasks without adequate counselling, training and debriefing.[1][1][1][1] However, the working conditions of agricultural workers as a whole, particularly non-permanent workers, remain poor and well below conditions prevailing in other economic sectors.[1] Accidents, including pesticide poisoning, among farmers and plantation workers contribute to increased health risks, including increased mortality.[1] In fact, according to the International Labour Organization, agriculture is one of the three most dangerous jobs in the world.[1]
Economical
Similar to environmental vegetarianism is the concept of economic vegetarianism. An economic vegetarian is someone who practices vegetarianism from either the philosophical viewpoint concerning issues such as public health and curbing world starvation, the belief that the consumption of meat is economically unsound, part of a conscious simple living strategy or just out of necessity. According to the WorldWatch Institute, "Massive reductions in meat consumption in industrial nations will ease their health care burden while improving public health; declining livestock herds will take pressure off rangelands and grainlands, allowing the agricultural resource base to rejuvenate. As populations grow, lowering meat consumption worldwide will allow more efficient use of declining per capita land and water resources, while at the same time making grain more affordable to the world's chronically hungry."[1]
Psychological
The "Appeal to nature" logical fallacy invites one to believe that something is good or right because it is natural.[1]
A metaphor has been presented by Douglas Dunn: that if one gives a young child an apple and a live chicken, the child would instinctively play with the chicken and eat the apple, whereas if a cat were presented with the same choices, its natural impulse would be the opposite.[1] Omnivorous and comparatively human-like species such as chimpanzees' offspring may not instinctively kill a prey animal, such as a Senegal Bushbaby, when presented with one and a piece of fruit either.[1] In a similar assertion, vegetarian Scott Adams wrote humorously: "I point out that a live cow makes a lion salivate, whereas a human just wants to say 'moo' and see if the cow responds."[1]
This same non-predatory inter-species interaction can be seen in adult chimpanzees, which have been seen toying with other animals without regarding them as prey and even occasionally socialising with other species.[1]
Cultural
People may choose vegetarianism because they were raised in a vegetarian household or because of a vegetarian partner, family member, or friend.
Limited vegetarianism has appeal for some young people in Western societies. A 2007 University of Michigan Medical School experiment on the diffusion of memes included an attempt to encourage limited vegetarianism.
Demographics
Gender
A 1992 market research study conducted by the Yankelovich research organisation claimed that "of the 12.4 million people [in the US] who call themselves vegetarian, 68 percent are female while only 32 percent are male."[1]
At least one study indicates that vegetarian women are more likely to have female babies. A study of 6,000 pregnant women in 1998 "found that while the national average in Britain is 106 boys born to every 100 girls, for vegetarian mothers the ratio was just 85 boys to 100 girls."[1] Catherine Collins of the British Dietetic Association has dismissed this as a "statistical fluke".[1]
There is speculation that diets high in soy, due to high isoflavone content, can have a feminising effect on human infants due to their action as phytoestrogens. Proponents of this theory claim that diets high in isoflavones promote earlier onset of female puberty and delayed male puberty.[1] However, a 2001 study conducted by the University of Pennsylvania found no significant differences in the later onset of puberty between infants raised on soy-based formula and cow milk formula.[1]
Country-specific information
Vegetarianism is viewed in different ways around the world. In some areas there is cultural and even legal support, but in others the diet is poorly understood or even frowned upon. In many countries food labelling is in place that makes it easier for vegetarians to identify foods compatible with their diets.
In India, not only is there food labelling, but many restaurants are marketed and signed as being either "Vegetarian" or "Non-Vegetarian". People who are vegetarian in India are usually Lacto-vegetarians, and therefore, to cater for this market, the majority of vegetarian restaurants in India do serve dairy products while eschewing egg products. Most Western vegetarian restaurants, in comparison, do serve eggs and egg-based products.
See also
- Fruitarian
- List of diets
- List of vegetarians
- Meat-free day
- Veganarchism
- Vegetarian cuisine
- Vegetarian Diet Pyramid
- Vegetarian or vegan cat food
References
External links
- Vegetarian and Vegan Information
- Resources for Vegetarian
- Resources/Support for Vegetarians
- Vegetarian Restaurant Wiki
- The Ethical Vegetarian
- Shattering The Meat Myth: Humans Are Natural Vegetarians by Kathy Feston, The Huffington Post, June 11 2009
- Eco-Eating: Eating as if the Earth Matters
Template:Vegetarianism Template:Alibendar:النباتية bg:Вегетарианство ca:Vegetarianisme cs:Vegetariánství cy:Llysieuaeth da:Vegetarisme de:Vegetarismus et:Taimetoitlus el:Χορτοφαγία es:Vegetarianismo eo:Vegetarismo fa:گیاهخواری fr:Végétarisme ga:Feoilséanadh gl:Vexetarianismo ko:채식주의 hi:शाकाहार hr:Vegetarijanska prehrana id:Vegetarian is:Grænmetishyggja it:Vegetarismo he:צמחונות lv:Veģetārisms lt:Vegetarizmas jbo:nalre'ucti hu:Vegetarianizmus mk:Вегетаријанство ms:Vegetarian nl:Vegetarisme ja:ベジタリアニズム no:Vegetarianisme ps:سابه خوړونکي pl:Wegetarianizm pt:Vegetarianismo ro:Vegetarianism ru:Вегетарианство simple:Vegetarianism sk:Vegetariánstvo sl:Vegetarijanstvo sr:Vegetarijanstvo sh:Vegetarijanstvo fi:Kasvissyönti sv:Vegetarian ta:தாவர உணவு முறை th:มังสวิรัตินิยม tr:Etyemezlik uk:Вегетаріанство vi:Ăn chay zh:素食主義
